After the recent headlines
about two large transport category aircraft unintentionally landing at the
wrong airport, it may seem as if this issue has only recently become a problem.
However, there are several documented occurrences of transport airplanes
landing at the wrong airport. See a full list here. A scenario that I can
attest to occurred back in 2004 when a Shuttle America Saab 340 destine for
University Park Airport in State College, PA mistakenly landed at Midstate
Regional Airport in Philipsburg PA. In
this circumstance, there were eight people aboard the aircraft and the runway at
Midstate regional airport was sufficiently long for the Saab 340 to safely take
off and land, therefore averting disaster.
Earlier this summer, I made a stop at the
University Park Airport on my way to White Plains, NY. From my observations,
there are several factors that could have led to this mistake. The area where this incident happened is
primarily surrounded by a large concentration of forests that lack in well-defined
landmarks. Additionally, the unique placement of both of these airports in
relation to the surrounding terrain can cause confusion. Midstate Regional Airport
is located on the top of a bluff whereas the University Park Airport is located
in the valley below. During my trip, I remember thinking for a brief period of
time that the Midstate Airport was in fact University Park Airport. I remember
being suspicious due to the distance I had expected to cover being less than
what I had actually covered at that point. Eventually, by consulting my
sectional chart and avionics equipment, I was able to determine that I was in
fact approaching Midstate instead of University Park. A primary cause of
confusion was the similar orientation of the airport runways and similar size
of the airport. In a larger and faster aircraft, pilots would not have ample
time to consult sectional charts and cross check with the visual references
they see outside as they fly. Additionally, the altitude at which larger
aircraft fly prevents intricate landmarks from helping positively identify the
correct airport.
Landing
and the wrong airport poses several hazards and operational issues. Safety is
greatly jeopardized due to the potential of landing at an airport with an inadequately
long runway. Runways that are too short can cause the aircraft overrun the runway
resulting in passenger and civilian harm.
Repositioning passengers after such an event causes operational
headaches. Additionally, getting approval to depart from an airport that is not
normally served by the company requires research and planning to ensure that
the movement of the aircraft can be done safely. Finally, large passenger
aircraft in the traffic pattern for an airport that the pilots are unaware that
they are landing at causes safety issues for other aircraft in the area.
Personally, I believe that
there are steps that can be taken in order to minimize the probabilities of
landing at the wrong airport. Research can be done to identify airports in
close proximity that have similar runway orientations and other factors that could
cause an incorrect identification of that airport. Notations can then be made
on sectional charts and in GPS databases on board the aircraft to alert pilots
of this potential. Another step that can be taken is providing a means of
positive identification for any airport that is served by scheduled passenger
aircraft. Placing a marking on the runway, a special light, or marking at some
point on the approach path would allow pilots to positively identify that they
are landing at an airport with scheduled service. Finally, including
confirmation of the correct airport into checklists might help as well.
In light of the recent
Southwest 737 landing at the wrong airport in Missouri, airline management has
decided to suspend the two pilots involved in this incident. As a pilot myself,
I agree that a temporary suspension is necessary, however I don't believe that
it should lead to the termination of their jobs. This opinion is largely
dependent on the cockpit voice recorder to determine what caused the confusion
and if there was any unnecessary behavior in the cockpit. If the pilots were
legitimately confused and had a valid line of thinking causing them to land at
the wrong airport, I don't think that it is necessary for them to be fired.
Remedial training should be provided and the aviation community should focus on
ways of preventing future occurrences such as this one.
Landing at the wrong airport could
potentially become a catastrophic event. Therefore, I feel that this is an
issue that needs to be brought to the front within the aviation community and
corrected before an unfortunate result was to occur.
I thought you did a good job finding a pretty comprehensive list of similar incidents. I think by bringing your personal experience with this airport into your blog was a great idea. I agree that with the close distance, similar orientation and size that there can be confusion for some airports. I think you had a good solution. Lets get a research team together and solve this problem!
ReplyDeleteI think your idea of having some sort of notation on a chart to alert pilots of similar airports in the same proximity is good one. Jeppeson does something similar for airports surrounded by unusual terrain, identifying them as a "special use airport" and crews/dispatch are required by the regs to brief about these airports prior to takeoff. Something similar could be implemented in this case.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the suspension of the Southwest pilots as well. I think they need to wait until the full investigation is complete to see what cause this to occur before they terminate the pilots from their job. A remedial training program would be a good thing to have the pilots go through to help prevent a future occurrence.
ReplyDeleteI really like how you incorporated your own experience into the topic. I agree the aviation community should develop notations on charts and in databases for airports that are close together with similar runways that notify pilots to use extreme caution.
ReplyDeleteI did like how you brought your personal experience into this. I can see how it would be very easy to mix up the two airports that had similar orientation.
ReplyDeleteIsn't the basic problem that we don't have positive visual identification of runways? How about painting the airport ID above the runway digits?
ReplyDelete